JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8151763; Use more informative format for problem list

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Just a follow-up, to avoid causing additional merge headaches, I'll 
revise the patch to make this change once the next round of Jigsaw 
changes get back in jdk9/dev 
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-March/003877.html).

Thanks,

-Joe

On 3/12/2016 1:28 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Looks good Joe.
>
> -Chris
>
>> On 11 Mar 2016, at 22:28, joe darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As Jon Gibbons has noted off-list, the problem list entries can directly include the bug number associated with the test in question, enabling better reporting. This format should be used rather than the current convention of putting the bug number in a comment.
>>
>> Please review the webrev to adopt the revised format for the problem list:
>>
>>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8151763.0/
>>
>> I've verified jtreg produces the same test list with the old and new versions of the problem list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Joe