JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8151763; Use more informative format for problem list

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Hi Jon,

Noted; I'll make that improvement in the next round.

Thanks for pointing this out,

-Joe

On 3/16/2016 4:50 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
>
> On 03/11/2016 07:28 PM, joe darcy wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> As Jon Gibbons has noted off-list, the problem list entries can 
>> directly include the bug number associated with the test in question, 
>> enabling better reporting. This format should be used rather than the 
>> current convention of putting the bug number in a comment.
>>
>> Please review the webrev to adopt the revised format for the problem 
>> list:
>>
>>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8151763.0/
>>
>> I've verified jtreg produces the same test list with the old and new 
>> versions of the problem list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Joe
>
>
> Joe,
>
> You can use a comma-separated list when multiple bugs are involved.   
> The only restriction is,  no embedded whitespace within the list
>
>  342 # Also 8080165
>  343 java/util/Arrays/ParallelPrefix.java   8085982 generic-all
>
> can be
>
>  343 java/util/Arrays/ParallelPrefix.java   8085982,8080165 generic-all
>
>
> -- Jon