RFR: 8152733: Avoid creating Manifest when checking for Multi-Release attribute
Paul Sandoz
paul.sandoz at oracle.com
Fri Mar 25 12:05:55 UTC 2016
> On 25 Mar 2016, at 02:06, Claes Redestad <claes.redestad at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the integration of the multi-release jar feature[1] caused a number of startup regressions, the primary cause of which was determined to be due to parsing manifests into java.util.jar.Manifest only to check for the Multi-Release attribute.
>
> This can be avoided by reusing the logic already in place to check for the Class-Path attribute.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152733
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8152733/webrev.01/
>
> Some additional cleanup was done in this joint effort: Paul suggested a few improvements/cleanups to the search code, two anonymous classes to check settings could be removed, and - even though JarFile doesn't provide any thread-safety guarantees - the checkForSpecialAttributes method can be made thread-safe with a synchronized block at little to no cost.
>
This looks good. Thanks for noticing the existing code for class-path parsing.
I agree with Alan, a comment as to why the good suffix shift can be reduced to a comparison would be helpful.
Paul.
> Thanks!
>
> /Claes
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132734
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list