JAXP default implementation and JDK-8152063

[Alan Bateman]

On 29/03/2016 10:55, Andrew Haley wrote:
> :
> I'm sure that's right.  However, we are also running the risk of
> breaking important use cases when JDK9 is released.  We're going to
> have to do a lot of work with developers to make sure that they can
> still work with JDK9.  The problem is that many developers do not even
> try to run with a new JDK until that JDK is released.  So, we have to
> make sure that we have enough escape hatches.
>
In this case, then -XaddExports should work as an escape hatch if really 
needed.

In the mean-time then we can see if there is way forward on this that 
doesn't introduce security or memory leak concerns.

-Alan.