RFR 9: 8152005: sun/misc/SunMiscSignalTest.java failed intermittently
Roger Riggs
Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com
Tue Mar 29 15:24:42 UTC 2016
Hi Joe,
ok, my thought was that extending the time out didn't affect the running
time of the test
and since the signal is handled by a separate thread a busy system might
be the cause.
I removed the re-raise of the signal so the test will fail if the signal
is not received
even after the longer timout.
Webrev updated in place,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-signal-8152005/
Thanks, Roger
On 3/28/2016 8:29 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> If the test is only rarely failing as-is, I'd prefer to keep the first
> timeout short and only fallback to the longer timeout in the fallback
> case.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>
> On 3/28/2016 11:22 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Please review this improvement to an intermittently failing test of
>> sun.misc.Signal.
>> The timeout value is increased in case of a busy system and for
>> additional
>> debug value the raising of the signal is retried.
>>
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-signal-8152005/
>>
>> Issue:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152005
>>
>> Thanks, Roger
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list