RFR: JDK-8061777, , (zipfs) IllegalArgumentException in ZipCoder.toString when using Shitft_JIS

Paul Sandoz paul.sandoz at oracle.com
Mon May 30 09:31:42 UTC 2016


Hi Sherman,

Do you consider modifying the new ZipPath constructor you added to accept a boolean value for UTF-8 encoding?

If so you can more clearly document the behaviour and avoid duplication of the operators in ZipFileSystem e.g.:

  return new ZipPath(this, first, zc.isUTF8());

Paul.

> On 27 May 2016, at 22:38, Xueming Shen <xueming.shen at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please help review the change for JDK-8061777.
> 
> issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8061777
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8061777
> 
> Cause: ZipPath/ZipFileSystem uses byte[] as the internal underlying storage for
> entry names (for better performance, as the "name" is stored as bytes inside
> the zip/jar file, it is desirable to avoid the redundant String<->byte[] conversion,
> if possible). With this design, it is natural to also work on byte[] directly for those
> "path" operations, including the "normalization", which mainly is to remove the
> redundant "/" and switch the "\" to "/". This appears to be a problem for non-utf8
> encoded zip file (utf8 is the default encoding used to de/encode the entry name
> for the Java jar/zip APIs), especially those double-byte encodings that have 0x5c
> ('\') as one of the double-byte bytes. The 0x5c byte will be mistakenly normalized
> to '\' if we normalize on the byte[] directly. The proposed change here is to
> normalize on the "String" to avoid this problem. Given the fact that Java jar/zip
> is specified to use utf-8 by default, to avoid the potential performance risk/cost
> for most of the zip/jar files (if we switch completely to the String based operation)
> the utf-8/byte[] path is still being used (as the default) when the encoding is utf-8.
> The implementation only switches to "String based" code path when the encoding
> is specifically specified as "non-utf8", which should be rare.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sherman




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list