[9] RFR: 8167240: Write new tests to cover functionality of existing 'jimage' options

Alexandre (Shura) Iline alexandre.iline at oracle.com
Thu Nov 3 18:47:01 UTC 2016


Denis,

I can see that you have switched to the top level test library with this change. With that you are getting more module dependencies than  just java.base. First of all, it would probably make sense to build only the classes you needed (which would be  jdk.test.lib.process.ProcessTools, I assume), but even if you only build that, jdk.test.lib.process.ProcessTools has dependencies outside java.base module.

You either have to declare @modules in your test or go back to the jdk/test/lib/testlibrary. Then, of course, unneeded module dependencies are questionable.

Shura


> On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:29 AM, Denis Kononenko <denis.kononenko at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've done some rework accordingly to Alan's and Shura's comments:
> 
> 1) removed overlapped tests from JImageToolTest.java;
> 
> 2) added new tests JImageVerifyTest.java for jimage verify;
> 
> 3) reorganized jtreg's tags;
> 
> The new WEBREV can be found here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dkononenko/8167240/webrev.01/
> 
> Thank you,
> Denis.
> 
> On 06.10.2016 19:37, Denis Kononenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Could someone please review these new tests for jimage utility.
>> 
>> There're 5 new files containing tests to cover use cases for 'info', 'list', 'extract' and other options. No new tests for 'verify'.
>> 
>> BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167240
>> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dkononenko/8167240/webrev.00/
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Denis.
> 



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list