Review request: JDK-8168386: Fix jdeps verbose options
Mandy Chung
mandy.chung at oracle.com
Fri Nov 11 22:58:59 UTC 2016
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 4:21 AM, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fuchs at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mandy,
>
> This looks good to me.
Thanks.
> However, if I'm not mistaken, jdeps will now no longer
> list java.base as a dependency, unless the dependency
> is on a jdk internal API.
>
That is only when using —-list-deps option. That is a separate issue. I will take it out from this webrev.
Mandy
> This might be worthy of some mention in release notes - if
> any tools are relying on jdeps output.
>
> best regards,
>
> -- daniel
>
> On 10/11/16 03:01, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8168386/webrev.00
>>
>> This patch tightens the option validation to jdeps and the new test shows some example of conflicting options.
>>
>> Mandy
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list