RFR[9] JDK-8158916: ProblemList.txt update for com/sun/jndi/ldap/DeadSSLLdapTimeoutTest.java

[Daniel Fuchs]

Hi John,

Looks good to me. Should windows-amd64 also be listed?
It appears the test also failing there (JDK-8152654)

best regards,

-- daniel

On 18/11/16 06:02, John Jiang wrote:
> Hi,
> Track this test issue with a new JBS bug JDK-8169942.
> Please take a look at the updated webrew:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjiang/8158916/webrev.01/, or the below,
>
> --- old/test/ProblemList.txt    2016-11-17 21:29:12.112822913 -0800
> +++ new/test/ProblemList.txt    2016-11-17 21:29:11.964822915 -0800
> @@ -298,6 +298,6 @@
>
>  # jdk_other
>
> -com/sun/jndi/ldap/DeadSSLLdapTimeoutTest.java                   8141370
> linux-i586,macosx-all
> +com/sun/jndi/ldap/DeadSSLLdapTimeoutTest.java                   8169942
> linux-i586,macosx-all
>
>  ############################################################################
>
>
> Best regards,
> John Jiang
>
>
> On 2016/11/8 18:53, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> On 08/11/16 01:30, John Jiang wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>
>>> On 2016/11/7 19:21, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>>>> Hi John,
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you should reach out to Rob who fixed JDK-8141370 to
>>>> make sure this is the right thing to do.
>>> just cc Rob Mckenna
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It seems the exclusion on problematic platforms [1] was deliberate:
>>>>
>>>>> Basically I've separated the failing subtest out into its own file and
>>>>> excluded it on the (intermittently) failing platforms.
>>> I see. But it should use an open issue.
>>> I would like to open a new issue to track this issue. But I don't get
>>> the exact failure log on DeadSSLLdapTimeoutTest.java, though the failure
>>> may still be related to SSLHandshakeException.
>>> When this test was born, it was in the ProblemList, so I suppose it has
>>> no chance to be executed by our automatic testing systems.
>>
>> I see. I agree it's better to have an open bug in the ProblemList.
>> But I am concerned if that bug is something that we never intend to
>> fix because the test is not appropriate for those platforms.
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> -- daniel
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> John Jiang
>>>
>>>>
>>>> best regards,
>>>>
>>>> -- daniel
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-December/037385.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07/11/16 02:37, John Jiang wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> com/sun/jndi/ldap/DeadSSLLdapTimeoutTest.java is associated to 8141370
>>>>> in ProblemList, though issue JDK-8141370 has been resolved.
>>>>> In fact, the fix for JDK-8141370 extracted some codes from
>>>>> com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapTimeoutTest.java to create
>>>>> com/sun/jndi/ldap/DeadSSLLdapTimeoutTest.java, and put the new test to
>>>>> ProblemList.
>>>>> It would be better to remove this item from ProblemList. If
>>>>> com/sun/jndi/ldap/DeadSSLLdapTimeoutTest.java still fails
>>>>> intermittently, we can put it back to ProblemList with the exact
>>>>> failure
>>>>> logs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158916
>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjiang/8158916/webrev.00/
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> John Jiang
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>