RFR: 8167005: Comment on the need for an empty constructor in ArrayList$Itr

[Jonathan Bluett-Duncan]

The explanation which Stuart gives for this change in
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167005 seems to describe why this
constructor is needed much better than the comment itself does. So I wonder
if it's worth adding the link to the bug report in the comment. E.g.

// prevent generation of synthetic class required for access to private
// constructor. See: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167005

Kind regards,
Jonathan

On 4 October 2016 at 21:28, Stuart Marks <stuart.marks at oracle.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 10/4/16 3:55 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2016-10-04 12:52, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/04/2016 12:50 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>>>
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8167005/webrev.01/
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the speedy review! :-)
>>
>
> Thanks for looking at this. The shorter text in the bug report is ok too.
>
> s'marks
>
>