RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 14

[Paul Sandoz]

> On 1 Feb 2017, at 08:44, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com <mailto:paul.sandoz at oracle.com>> wrote:
> 
> I think that would be too pedantic as well. At this late stage in 9 i prefer to leave things as they are and not fiddle. Revise for 10?
> 
> We could, but jsr166 primitive version control technology doesn't have a mechanism to maintain such distinctions.
> 

Ok. Sorry for being so conservative, just concerned given the schedule.


> I still think the jdk9 docs are misleading and we should do something to fix them.  The high-level bit for users is "Bulk operations are non-atomic"!  Maybe we should include that sentence?!


Ok.

Paul.