RFR: jsr166 jdk? integration wave ?

Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Fri Feb 24 15:11:08 UTC 2017


On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
wrote:

> Martin,
>
> > On 22 Feb 2017, at 20:30, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > We half promised "no more jdk9 changes", but ...
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/
> jsr166-jdk9-integration/
> >
> > as usual, I think they should go into jdk9, but y'all probably tell me
> it's
> > too late (and that's OK; we can retarget for jdk10)
>
> Are there any spec changes, or all rewordings that do not affect spec
> (there’s quite a bit of noise in the webrevs )?
>

There's only the "spec change" in ThreadPoolExecutor.java.  I don't count
that as a "real" spec change, because the original intent is clear enough,
but you might disagree.


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list