RFR: 8170785: Excessive allocation in ParseUtil.encodePath
Roger Riggs
Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com
Tue Jan 3 21:22:08 UTC 2017
Hi Claes,
So Windows didn't suffer from having the '\' separator.
ParseUtil:
firstEncodeIndex:121:
'a' - 'z' seems more frequent than '/' or '.'; does it improve the
stats to move that range to the beginning of the if.
(yes the compiler can re-order).
line 125:
Since 127 is known to need encoding it could be >= 0x007f
line 136: I suppose the arraycopy intrinsic already optimizes length == 0;
Line 134: I question the math on * 2 + 16 -index; (But this is
pre-existing code)
if there were lots of characters that needed encoding it might be
possible to overflow the array since 1 char is replaced by at least 3
and up to 9.
16 seems like a questionable fudge factor; but perhaps it has not
been a problem in practice.
$.02, Roger
On 1/3/2017 9:46 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some users reports high allocation rates in ParseUtil.encodePath,
> regardless of whether paths actually need to be encoded or not.
> Since this is a commonly used utility it makes sense.
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8170785/webrev.01
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170785
>
> This patch provides a semantically neutral fast-path for cases when
> the path does not need to be encoded (up to 5x speedup), reduces
> allocation when the string has a prefix that does not need to be
> encoded (1-2x speedup) and no regression when using a separator
> that's not '/' or the first char needs encoding.
>
> Interpreted performance is not affected much either: small positive
> when no encoding is needed, neutral or negligible regression
> otherwise.
>
> Thanks!
>
> /Claes
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list