8182743: Ineffective use of volatile hurts performance of Charset.atBugLevel()

[Kazunori Ogata]

Hi Christoph,

Thank you very much for your help!

For JDK9 updates and JDK8 updates, it is desirable if we can back port the 
removal of volatile.  What should I do for it?


Regards,
Ogata



From:   "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
To:     Kazunori Ogata <OGATAK at jp.ibm.com>, "nio-dev at openjdk.java.net" 
<nio-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Cc:     core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Date:   2017/07/03 17:17
Subject:        RE: 8182743: Ineffective use of volatile hurts performance 
of Charset.atBugLevel()



Hi,

I've pushed to JDK10 now: 
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/7a2bc0a80087

What do you think, shall we try to downport a fix to JDK9 updates and JDK8 
updates, which simply removes the volatile as we can't bring this behavior 
changing fix down? 

Thanks
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kazunori Ogata [mailto:OGATAK at jp.ibm.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 30. Juni 2017 20:31
> To: Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>
> Cc: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; core-libs-dev 
<core-libs-
> dev at openjdk.java.net>; nio-dev at openjdk.java.net; ppc-aix-port-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: 8182743: Ineffective use of volatile hurts performance of
> Charset.atBugLevel()
> 
> Hi Sean,
> 
> Thank you for your comments.
> 
> I fixed the copyright and updated webrev:
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~horii/8182743/webrev.03/
> 
> 
> > * The bug ID referenced in mail/webrev links is wrong. It should be
> > 8182743 ?
> 
> Yes, they should be 8182743.  I fixed both.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Ogata
> 
> 
> Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com> wrote on 2017/06/30 23:57:25:
> 
> > From: Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>
> > To: Kazunori Ogata <OGATAK at jp.ibm.com>, "Langer, Christoph"
> > <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> > Cc: "ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net" <ppc-aix-port-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net>, core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>,
> > "nio-dev at openjdk.java.net" <nio-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Date: 2017/06/30 23:57
> > Subject: Re: 8179527:(8182743?) Ineffective use of volatile hurts
> > performance of Charset.atBugLevel()
> >
> > Ogata,
> >
> > minor comments from me.
> >
> > * The bug ID referenced in mail/webrev links is wrong. It should be
> > 8182743 ?
> > * The copyright change in Charset-X-Coder.java.template is the wrong
> > format. You can simply replace 2013 with 2017.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sean.
> >
> > On 29/06/17 19:49, Kazunori Ogata wrote:
> > > Hi Christoph,
> > >
> > > I updated webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~horii/8179527/webrev.02/
> > >
> > > This one includes changes in tests.  I removed all @run and @build
> > > directives in the tests because those after removing "@run
> main/othervm
> > > -Dsun.nio.cs.bugLevel=1.4 EmptyCharsetName" are the same as the
> default
> > > ones.  I checked the modified tests passed.
> > >
> > > I also fixed the copyright lines.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ogata
> > >
> > >
> > > "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote on 2017/06/28
> > > 21:04:36:
> > >
> > >> From: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> > >> To: Kazunori Ogata <OGATAK at jp.ibm.com>
> > >> Cc: Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>, Claes Redestad
> > >> <claes.redestad at oracle.com>, core-libs-dev <core-libs-
> > >> dev at openjdk.java.net>, "nio-dev at openjdk.java.net" <nio-
> > >> dev at openjdk.java.net>, "ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net"
> > > <ppc-aix-port-
> > >> dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > >> Date: 2017/06/28 21:04
> > >> Subject: RE: 8179527: Ineffective use of volatile hurts performance
> of
> > >> Charset.atBugLevel()
> > >>
> > >> Hi Ogata,
> > >>
> > >>>> remove the second run with -Dsun.nio.cs.bugLevel=1.4
> > >>> How can I do this?  Is it sufficient to remove the following line 
at
> > > the
> > >>> beginning of the file?: "@run main/othervm 
-Dsun.nio.cs.bugLevel=1.4
> > >>> EmptyCharsetName"
> > >> Yes, this line should be removed. Currently there are two @run
> > > directives
> > >> which cause running the testcase twice. Once in normal mode and 
once
> > > with
> > >> bugLevel set to 1.4. So, if "sun.nio.cs.bugLevel" ought to be 
removed
> > > then
> > >> the second iteration of the test is obsolete. And then one should
> > > probably
> > >> remove the whole "compat" handling in the test.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards
> > >> Christoph
> > >>
> > >
> >
>