java.util.Pair

[Hohensee, Paul]

That’s a possibility. We could recommend that as an alternative.

Thanks,

Paul

On 7/13/17, 10:29 AM, "Maurizio Cimadamore" <maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com> wrote:

    Maybe automatic refactoring to Map.Entry ? With the new static method 
    added in 9, creating one is also very fluent (but I know that Entry 
    doesn't convey same meaning as Pair in method signatures/fields)
    
    http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java/util/Map.html#entry-K-V-
    
    Cheers
    Maurizio
    
    
    On 13/07/17 18:22, joe darcy wrote:
    > Hi Paul,
    >
    > See the discussion in thread:
    >
    > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2010-March/003973.html 
    >
    > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2010-April/thread.html 
    >
    >
    > In short, no current plans to add java.util.Pair.
    >
    > -Joe
    >
    >
    > On 7/13/2017 10:07 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
    >> See the ancient https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4947273.
    >>
    >> At Amazon, many projects depend on JavaFX to get only a single class, 
    >> namely javafx.util.Pair. That means that we must distribute OpenJFX 
    >> along with our internal OpenJDK distribution, or split 
    >> javafx.util.Pair out into a separate package, both of which we’d like 
    >> to avoid in the future. So, are there any plans to add java.util.Pair 
    >> to JDK10?
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >>
    >> Paul
    >>
    >