RFR 8179566: Add additional jaxws messages to be translated

[Leo Jiang]

Got it, thank you Mandy!

I will wait this update into repo until May 5th 11:30pm (Beijing).

Thanks,
Leo

On 05/04/2017 11:21 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
> The JAX-WS in JDK 9 is going to be 2.3.0 [1].  java.xml.ws is not resolved by default.  JAX-WS 2.1 API can only be loaded to the runtime from class path if java.xml.ws is not resolved.  The JAX-WS runtime in JDK 9 will not be loaded in this case.  If this message is specific for this scenario, this message is okay to keep it and would be good to add a comment saying “this message should not be loaded from JDK 9 runtime"
>
> Roman has to confirm whether this message will not be used when running in JDK 9.
>
> Mandy
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-May/047426.html
>
>
>> On May 3, 2017, at 7:24 PM, Leo Jiang <li.jiang at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> ===  Copy from David's email
>> That endorsed part is problem. It is valid in JDK-8 but not in 9. Following message is my proposed solution. It would fit JDK-8 and 9.
>> JAX-WS 2.1 API is loaded from {0}, But JAX-WS runtime requires JAX-WS 2.2 API. Use the standard override mechanism to load JAX-WS 2.2 API
>>
>> Do you think that this solution is OK?
>> ===
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leo
>>
>>
>> On 05/04/2017 05:14 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 3, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 03/05/2017 19:58, Lance Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +runtime.modeler.addressing.responses.nosuchmethod = JAX-WS 2.1 API is loaded from {0}, But JAX-WS runtime requires JAX-WS 2.2 or newer API. \
>>>>> +  Use the standard override mechanism to load JAX-WS 2.2 or newer API.
>>>>> \ No newline at end of file
>>>>>
>>>> "Use the standard override mechanism". I wonder if this meant to say the "endorsed standards override mechanism". In any case, it feels like a message for when JAX-WS is running on an older release. Do you know if that is true?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Since this resource bundle is for JDK 9, it should say “upgradeable module path” instead. But is this message intended for older release and is it ever used for JDK 9?
>>>
>>> Mandy
>>>
>