RFR 9+-: 8180582: The bind to rmiregistry is rejected by registryFilter even though registryFilter is set

[Daniel Fuchs]

Hi Roger,

Looks good! Just one nit with the test:

  194             registry.unbind(name);
  195             Assert.fail("Registry filter should have rejected 
depth: " + depthOverride + 1);

Technically, the test will also pass if bind() succeed but
unbind() fails - for some unforeseen reason.

best regards,

-- daniel

On 25/05/17 16:31, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Please review an update to the RMI Registry built-in serial filter 
> implementation limit on the depth
> of a instance that can be bound in the registry.  The initial depth 
> limit was 5 and it was too limiting
> for some existing applications.  It limit is updated to depth = 20 and 
> should be more than adequate.
> 
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-depth-max-8180582/index.html
> 
> Issue:
>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180582
> 
> Thanks, Roger