RFR: JDK-8210031: implementation for JVM Constants API
Roger Riggs
Roger.Riggs at oracle.com
Thu Dec 6 16:07:03 UTC 2018
Hi Vicente,
On 12/05/2018 09:13 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> Thanks for your comments, see my comments below. I have published
> another iteration at [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Vicente
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8210031/webrev.12/
>
>
>>
>> - bootStrapArgs() - the return is always non-null, with zero length
>> array for non args?
>
> it has to be, IMO, as the private constructor that is the only one
> that assigns a value to field bootstrapArgs makes sure that the
> assigned value is non-null
My point is that the javadoc is a specification; so the reader should
not need to
look at an implementation to completely understand the required behavior.
>
>>
>> DynamicConstantDesc.java:
>> - First sentences should end with period. "."
>>
>> - ofCanonical: 2nd sentence, "Classes ... produces ... a
>> ConstantDesc"; grammar?
>>
>> - of Canaonical(): So a conforming implementation is not required to
>> return the
>> well known values, only suggested.
>>
>> ClassDesc.java:
>> - The create methods should not be required to create new
>> instances. Use "return" instead of "create".
>>
>> - How are class descriptors created for 'nested' classes (as opposed
>> to inner classes).
>> It is worth describing or referencing how that should be done.
>
> not sure I get what you mean. If you want to create a class descriptor
> for a nested class you should be able to invoke inner() with an string
> containing a number, what should be made more clear here in your opinion?
In other places in java specs, there is a distinction made between
'inner' classes and 'nested' classes.
If the same API is used for both, it would be clearer to the reader if
it mentioned nested.
Thanks, Roger
>
>>
>> MethodTypeDesc.java:
>> - First sentences should end with period. "."
>>
>> Regards, Roger
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/2018 01:12 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/3/18 11:12 AM, Vicente Romero wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Can I have the final nod to the JVM constants API, there have been
>>>> some changes since the last review iteration. Thanks to the
>>>> internal and external developers that have taken the time to
>>>> provide feedback so far. The links to the last versions are:
>>>>
>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8210031/webrev.10/
>>>> javadoc:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8210031/javadoc.18/overview-summary.html
>>>> specdiff:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8210031/specdiff.08/overview-summary.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> I reviewed webrev.10 and overall looks good to me. A couple of
>>> minor comments and some of them seems to be fixed already in amber
>>> repo. No need to generate a new webrev.
>>>
>>> Nit: The javadoc of the new methods starts with "Returns", "Return",
>>> "Produce", "Create", "Resolve", "Compares" etc. It'd be good to do a
>>> pass and fix the verb form consistently.
>>>
>>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java
>>> nit: Line 163 seems to have extra white-spaces, not aligned with
>>> the other superinterfaces.
>>>
>>> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/ClassWriterImpl.java
>>> 74 private static final Set<String> suppressSubtypesSet
>>> 75 = Set.of("java.lang.Object",
>>> 76 "org.omg.CORBA.Object");
>>>
>>> This is not related to your change. CORBA is no longer in JDK.
>>> Maybe this special casing is no longer needed. It may worth
>>> filing a JBS issue to examine this.
>>>
>>> ConstantDescs.java
>>> 64 // Don't change the order of these declarations!
>>>
>>> Is there any code depending on this order?
>>>
>>> DirectMethodHandleDesc.java
>>> 46 * {@link MethodHandle}. A {@linkplain
>>> DirectMethodHandleDescImpl} corresponds to
>>>
>>> typo: DirectMethodHandleDescImpl
>>>
>>> 57 /**
>>> 58 * Kinds of method handles that can be described with
>>> {@linkplain DirectMethodHandleDesc}.
>>> 59 */
>>> 60 enum Kind {
>>>
>>> This needs @since 12
>>>
>>> DynamicCallSiteDesc.java
>>> 59 * @param bootstrapMethod a {@link
>>> DirectMethodHandleDescImpl} describing the
>>> 60 * bootstrap method for the {@code
>>> invokedynamic}
>>>
>>> typo: DirectMethodHandleDescImpl and in a few other @param
>>>
>>> Mandy
>>>
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list