RFR 8190378: Java EE and CORBA modules removal

[Lance Andersen]

Hi David,

I thought I did make that change.  Let me go back and double check and if not, will push.  My build worked fine but maybe I missed this in a merge.

Best
Lance
> On Feb 13, 2018, at 8:05 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Lance,
> 
> In Docs.gmk you seem to have missed this:
> 
> 445 ################################################################################
> 446 # Setup generation of the Java SE API documentation (javadoc + modulegraph)
> 447
> 448 # The Java SE module scope is just java.se.ee and its transitive indirect
> 449 # exports.
> 450 JAVASE_MODULES := java.se.ee
> 451
> 452 $(eval $(call SetupApiDocsGeneration, JAVASE_API, \
> 453     MODULES := $(JAVASE_MODULES), \
> 454     SHORT_NAME := $(JAVASE_SHORT_NAME), \
> 455     LONG_NAME := $(JAVASE_LONG_NAME), \
> 456     TARGET_DIR := $(IMAGES_OUTPUTDIR)/javase-docs/api, \
> 457 ))
> 
> which now results in a doc build hanging due to the non-existent java.se.ee module. It leads to execution of:
> 
> grep -e @moduleGraph
> 
> with no module-info.java argument, which causes grep to hang trying to read from stdin.
> 
> At least that is what my analysis indicates. I simply set:
> 
> JAVASE_MODULES :=
> 
> to work around it.
> 
> David
> -----
> 
> On 8/02/2018 11:37 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 3:04 AM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 07/02/2018 16:57, Lance Andersen wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> I think we are at a point where we are ready to start reviewing  the changes to remove the Java EE and CORBA modules as JEP 320, JDK-8189188,  has been  targeted to JDK 11.
>>>> The CSR for removing the modules has been approved: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193757 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193757>
>>>> 
>>>>  The open webrev can be found at:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/8190378/open_changes/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/8190378/open_changes/>
>>>> 
>>> 800 KLOC deleted, wonderful!
>>> 
>>> The update to technology-summary.html page means its html title no longer matches the contents. We should probably change it to "JCP Technologies in JDK 11" for now.
>> I updated the webrev. Thanks for catching that (btw we missed this for JDK 10)
>>> 
>>> The removal of test cases from the tests in tools/launcher/modules removes most of the test coverage for the upgrade module path. We'll need to replace these sub-tests. Can you create an issue to track that?
>> I can do that
>>> 
>>> Everything else looks good and it's okay to track residual issues with other JIRA issues. I think the important thing is to get this monster patch into JDK builds soon so that libraries and the eco system can start to adjust.
>> Thank you Alan for the review
>> Best
>> Lance
>>> 
>>> -Alan
>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>
>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>
>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>> Oracle Java Engineering
>> 1 Network Drive
>> Burlington, MA 01803
>> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com> <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>>

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>