Thread.interrupted() spec is confusing
Tagir Valeev
amaembo at gmail.com
Sun Feb 18 10:17:08 UTC 2018
Hello!
A Thread.interrupted() static method (not to be confused with
Thread.isInterrupted() instance method) spec states:
* <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/67cdc215ed70/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.java#l1030>
* <p>A thread interruption ignored because a thread was not alive
<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/67cdc215ed70/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.java#l1031>
* at the time of the interrupt will be reflected by this method
<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/67cdc215ed70/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.java#l1032>
* returning false.
The Thread.interrupted() always applies to the current thread. I don't
understand how it's possible that a current thread is not alive. To me this
note is redundant and should be removed. Am I missing something?
With best regards,
Tagir Valeev.
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list