RFR 8170159 Improve the performance of BitSet traversal

[Martin Buchholz]

+1

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Jun 15, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
>
> Still looks correct, but I might keep looking for something  more elegant.
> What bothers me a little now is
>
> 1290                         long word = words[u] & (WORD_MASK << i);
>
>
> which is part of the initial setup and is not necessary on each iteration.
>
>
> I was looking at this too. From a performance perspective i am not very
> concerned. Aesthetically it bothers me, but at this point i am willing to
> declare victory and patch later if there is a better way.
>
> Paul.
>