RFR: Here are some Thread cleanup patches
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Wed Mar 28 02:21:22 UTC 2018
On 28/03/2018 12:07 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> java -Xlog:class+init=trace -version |& grep -Ew
> 'annotation|lang.Thread|Stable'
> [0.019s][info][class,init] 10 Initializing 'java/lang/Thread'
> (0x00000007c0006400)
Thanks.
> Intuitively, class+init should be a subset of class+load, and the
> experiment above supports that.
The initialization order can be quite different to the load order.
David
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:59 PM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com
> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> On 28/03/2018 11:50 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Martin Buchholz
> <martinrb at google.com <mailto:martinrb at google.com>
> <mailto:martinrb at google.com <mailto:martinrb at google.com>>> wrote:
>
> At least the VM doesn't have to run any risky java code
>
>
> ?? Why is Martin so sure ??
> Let's check:
>
> java -Xlog:class+load=trace -version |& grep -Ew
> 'annotation|lang.Thread'
> [0.010s][info ][class,load] java.lang.Thread source: jrt:/java.base
> [0.010s][info ][class,load]
> java.lang.Thread$UncaughtExceptionHandler source: jrt:/java.base
> [0.012s][info ][class,load] java.lang.annotation.Annotation
> source: jrt:/java.base
>
> So Stable does __not__ have to be class-loaded when Thread is
> class-loaded.
>
>
> Can you check with class+initialization please.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list