RFR: More cleanup patches
mandy chung
mandy.chung at oracle.com
Sat Mar 31 01:12:16 UTC 2018
On 3/31/18 12:29 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 4:31 AM, mandy chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com
> <mailto:mandy.chung at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>
> For this change, I am okay with most of the changes except I
> prefer the while loop to the for-loop with the local variable
> declaration.
>
>
> I prefer the idiom with the declaration in the for loop ("keep
> variable scope as small as possible"), but reverting:
>
> diff --git
> a/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/module/ModuleHashesBuilder.java
> b/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/module/ModuleHashesBuilder.java
> ---
> a/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/module/ModuleHashesBuilder.java
> +++
> b/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/module/ModuleHashesBuilder.java
> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@
> Graph.Builder<String> builder = new Graph.Builder<>();
> Deque<ResolvedModule> todo = new
> ArrayDeque<>(configuration.modules());
> Set<ResolvedModule> visited = new HashSet<>();
> - for (ResolvedModule rm; (rm = todo.poll()) != null; ) {
> + ResolvedModule rm;
> + while ((rm = todo.poll()) != null) {
> if (visited.add(rm)) {
> builder.addNode(rm.name <http://rm.name>());
> for (ResolvedModule dm : rm.reads()) {
> @@ -211,7 +212,8 @@
> public Set<T> dfs(Set<T> roots) {
> ArrayDeque<T> todo = new ArrayDeque<>(roots);
> Set<T> visited = new HashSet<>();
> - for (T u; (u = todo.poll()) != null; ) {
> + T u;
> + while ((u = todo.poll()) != null) {
> if (visited.add(u) && contains(u)) {
> adjacentNodes(u).stream()
> .filter(v -> !visited.contains(v))
>
+1
Thanks.
Mandy
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list