RFR for 6443578 and 6202130: UTF-8 in Manifests

[Philipp Kunz]

Hi Brain and Roger,

Thank you very much for your hint about submitting patches.

In the meantime I got feeback [1] from Xueming Shen and I sent two 
(much) smaller portions [2] and [3] which makes [5] now obsolete.

I saw through my own messages again and found them having the patches 
attached. Both [2] and [3] have their patches attached in the email I 
sent as well as displayed when viewing the message in the mail archive 
as a link at the bottom. While not all my previous messages were in that 
form, I see that webrev form from me as not an author as in [4] is not 
useful and would guess this should be all right for [2] and [3] or else, 
please, let me know.

In short summary, I'd be glad to find a sponsor or get feedback for [2] 
and [3].

Regards,
Philipp


[1] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052946.html
[2] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052962.html
[3] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052963.html
[4] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052942.html
[5] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052921.html


On 04.05.2018 22:24, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> For more specifics about allowed attachment types see [1].
>
> Brian
>
> [1] 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/code-tools-dev/2018-March/000378.html
>
> On May 4, 2018, at 12:51 PM, Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com 
> <mailto:Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>> Just a reminder that OpenJDK can *only* accept patches 
>> viacr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/>
>> (as an author) or inline or attached in email.
>