RFR: jsr166 jdk integration 2018-05

[Peter Levart]

On 05/20/18 00:54, John Rose wrote:
> The phrase “incorrect results” in
> List cannot be carte blanche to add checks where we are afraid the
> programmer might have made an error even if we cannot prove one; that
> would be just officious mind-reading.
+1

I'm all for adding checks that prevent programming errors, but not for 
the price of preventing a legal and perfectly logical usecase, such as 
the one Martin has demonstrated.

Regards, Peter