[core-libs] RFR (L): 8010319: Implementation of JEP 181: Nest-Based Access Control

[Peter Levart]

On 05/21/2018 07:57 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> Do we really need to spell out the case for primitives and arrays? If 
> so would it suffice to add the following:
>
> "A class or interface that is not explicitly a member of a nest *(such 
> as primitive or array classes)*, is a member of the nest consisting 
> only of itself, and is the nest host. Every class and interface is a 
> member of exactly one nest." 

That's fine, but then someone might wonder whether only primitive and 
array classes are not explicit members of a nest.

What about:

"A class or interface that is not explicitly a member of a nest 
*(including but not limited to primitive and array classes)*, is a 
member of the nest consisting only of itself, and is the nest host. 
Every class and interface is a member of exactly one nest."

Regards, Peter