RFR: jsr166 jdk integration 2018-05
Stuart Marks
stuart.marks at oracle.com
Tue May 22 21:58:16 UTC 2018
Hi Martin,
On 5/22/18 8:50 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> We seem to have enough consensus to change the modCount behavior of
> replaceAll.
Sorry, I don't agree that there is such consensus. There are about half a dozen
different issues all at play, spread across several messages throughout the
thread. Instead of responding to the individual messages piecemeal, I'm trying
to gather them into a unified reply. And I'm still digesting the emails that
came in over the weekend. More to come on this.
> But let's leave that to a future change and get this integration in by
> (temporarily) reverting to the status quo: [...]
Thanks, I appreciate your taking this approach.
I've filed JDK-8203662 to cover the future change, and I've assigned it to you.
The CSR request can also be linked to that issue.
I've also filed JDK-8203663 to cover the broader issue of any spec changes and
the inconsistency of CME policy across the different collection fail-fast
collections in the JDK.
s'marks
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list