RFR: jsr166 jdk integration 2018-05

Stuart Marks stuart.marks at oracle.com
Tue May 22 21:58:16 UTC 2018


Hi Martin,

On 5/22/18 8:50 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> We seem to have enough consensus to change the modCount behavior of
> replaceAll.

Sorry, I don't agree that there is such consensus. There are about half a dozen 
different issues all at play, spread across several messages throughout the 
thread. Instead of responding to the individual messages piecemeal, I'm trying 
to gather them into a unified reply. And I'm still digesting the emails that 
came in over the weekend. More to come on this.

> But let's leave that to a future change and get this integration in by
> (temporarily) reverting to the status quo: [...]

Thanks, I appreciate your taking this approach.

I've filed JDK-8203662 to cover the future change, and I've assigned it to you. 
The CSR request can also be linked to that issue.

I've also filed JDK-8203663 to cover the broader issue of any spec changes and 
the inconsistency of CME policy across the different collection fail-fast 
collections in the JDK.

s'marks


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list