[12] RFR of JDK-8210353: Move java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java back to tier1

Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Thu Oct 11 06:27:21 UTC 2018


Looks good !

Rémi

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Amy Lu" <amy.lu at oracle.com>
> À: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 11 Octobre 2018 08:13:44
> Objet: Re: [12] RFR of JDK-8210353: Move java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java back to tier1

> Ping ~
> 
> It's no longer running this test in a separate job as test OOM issue
> (JDK-8199265) fixed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amy
> 
> On 2018/9/4 5:46 PM, Amy Lu wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java
>>
>> This test was demoted to tier2 due to JDK-8199265 (test fails with
>> OOM). This issue has been fixed (in jdk-11+20) and test has been run
>> (in tier2) without failure happening after that.
>>
>> Let's move it back to tier1.
>>
>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210353
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amlu/8210353/webrev.00/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amy
>>
>> diff --git a/test/jdk/TEST.groups b/test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> --- a/test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> +++ b/test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> @@ -35,8 +35,7 @@
>>      :jdk_lang
>>
>>  tier1_part2 = \
>> -    :jdk_util \
>> -    -java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java
>> +    :jdk_util
>>
>>  tier1_part3 = \
>>      :jdk_math \
>> @@ -67,9 +66,7 @@
>>      -sun/nio/cs/ISO8859x.java \
>>      :jdk_other \
>>      :jdk_text \
>> -    :jdk_time \
>> -    java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java
>> -
>> +    :jdk_time
>>
>>  tier2_part3 = \
>>      :jdk_net
>> diff --git a/test/jdk/java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java
>> b/test/jdk/java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java
>> --- a/test/jdk/java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java
>> +++ b/test/jdk/java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize2.java
>> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
>>   * @test
>>   * @bug 8072909
>>   * @summary Test TimSort stack size on big arrays
>> - * @key intermittent
>>   * @library /lib/testlibrary /test/lib
>>   * @modules java.management
>>   *          java.base/jdk.internal


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list