JDK-8210280 - Unnecessary reallocation when invoking HashMap.putAll()
Michal Vala
mvala at redhat.com
Tue Jan 29 10:00:12 UTC 2019
Hi Martin,
I'd like to finish this review. Are you still willing to sponsor this?
Thanks!
On 1/9/19 11:39 AM, Michal Vala wrote:
> ping
>
> On 1/3/19 9:31 PM, Michal Vala wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> can we please finish this review?
>>
>> On 12/19/18 6:32 PM, Michal Vala wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/19/18 4:15 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 6:59 AM Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Martin,
>>>>>
>>>>> It is also useful and conventional to print the seed of the random
>>>>> so that if necessary it can be reproduced.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For many years, we've been using ThreadLocalRandom for testing, and that
>>>> does not allow setting a seed.
>>>>
>>>> I remain unconvinced that saving a seed has value in the real world. When
>>>> a randomized test fails, running it with sufficient iterations has always
>>>> worked for me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What's the reason behind using ThreadLocalRandom?
>>>
>>> In my opinion, reproducing the issue is key. One failure of randomized test
>>> run might be caused by one issue, second run due to another issue. How we
>>> reproduce then and how we know even how many issues we have? When we're
>>> running random tests until it pass, it might even hide the issue.
>>>
>>> They sure have good value on reveal the issue, but then we have to know how
>>> to reproduce and what we're searching for.
>>>
>>> If this case would not require ThreadLocalRandom and Random is enough, I'd
>>> like to use that because of benefits I've mentioned.
>>>
>>
>
--
Michal Vala
OpenJDK QE
Red Hat Czech
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list