RFR: JDK-8217792 : Investigate what modules are included

Andy Herrick andy.herrick at oracle.com
Wed Jan 30 23:17:31 UTC 2019


yes - I will put the else back - no impact on functionality (both can't 
be true), but it reads better with the else, conforms to the coding 
style, and could be minutely faster.

/Andy


On 1/30/2019 5:40 PM, Alexander Matveev wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8217792/webrev.03/src/jdk.jpackage/share/classes/jdk/jpackage/internal/JLinkBundlerHelper.java.frames.html 
>
> Line 272: Did you mean "if" here? I think it should be changed back to 
> "else if".
>
> Otherwise looks fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander
>
> On 1/30/2019 2:05 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
>> Please review the jpackage fix for bug [1] at [2].
>>
>> This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open sandbox 
>> repository (jpackage).
>>
>> JDK-8217792 : Investigate what modules are included
>>
>> For modules included in the runtime of a non-modular application, we 
>> now computes all modules that export an API as the root modules and 
>> compute their transitive closure, and do service binding.  As a 
>> result, by default you get all modules except 10 internal modules.
>>
>> For jre-installer (without --runtime-image option) we revert to 
>> including all modules.
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217792
>>
>> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8217792/webrev.03/
>>
>> /Andy
>>
>



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list