[BUG] Inet6Address.isIPv4CompatibleAddress uses wrong prefix
Rob Spoor
openjdk at icemanx.nl
Mon Jun 24 20:57:50 UTC 2019
I found a bug in Inet6Adress.isIPv4CompatibleAddress(). While parsing
correctly uses the ::ffff:<IPv4> format, isIPv4CompatibleAddress()
checks for ::<IPv4> instead. An example:
Inet6Address address = (Inet6Address)
InetAddress.getByName("::192.168.1.13");
System.out.printf("%s: %b%n", address,
address.isIPv4CompatibleAddress());
This should print false, but instead it prints true.
The error is in the Inet6Address.Inet6AddressHolder class:
boolean isIPv4CompatibleAddress() {
if ((ipaddress[0] == 0x00) && (ipaddress[1] == 0x00) &&
(ipaddress[2] == 0x00) && (ipaddress[3] == 0x00) &&
(ipaddress[4] == 0x00) && (ipaddress[5] == 0x00) &&
(ipaddress[6] == 0x00) && (ipaddress[7] == 0x00) &&
(ipaddress[8] == 0x00) && (ipaddress[9] == 0x00) &&
(ipaddress[10] == 0x00) && (ipaddress[11] == 0x00)) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
I think that bytes 10 and 11 should both be (byte) 0xFF instead of 0x00.
This is what's being used in IPAddressUtil, which is used for parsing:
private static boolean isIPv4MappedAddress(byte[] addr) {
if (addr.length < INADDR16SZ) {
return false;
}
if ((addr[0] == 0x00) && (addr[1] == 0x00) &&
(addr[2] == 0x00) && (addr[3] == 0x00) &&
(addr[4] == 0x00) && (addr[5] == 0x00) &&
(addr[6] == 0x00) && (addr[7] == 0x00) &&
(addr[8] == 0x00) && (addr[9] == 0x00) &&
(addr[10] == (byte)0xff) &&
(addr[11] == (byte)0xff)) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
Maybe it's an idea to let Inet6Address.Inet6AddressHolder delegate to
this latter method?
Rob
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list