RFR: JDK8U Backport of JDK-8042131 and JDK-8210633
Langer, Christoph
christoph.langer at sap.com
Mon Mar 25 07:12:12 UTC 2019
Hi there,
since this is a downport for jdk/jdk, I think the copyright headers should be the same as upstream.
So, for src/share/classes/java/time/format/DateTimeFormatterBuilder.java, you should take 2018 as copyright year. For the test the headers look correct.
As for jdk8u push: Will you push it to OpenJDK 8 updates or to Oracle 8 updates. For the former, you'll have to request downport by setting the jdk8u-fix-request label in the bugs.
Best regards
Christoph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of
> Ramanand Patil
> Sent: Montag, 25. März 2019 07:38
> To: Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com>; Naoto Sato
> <naoto.sato at oracle.com>; core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>;
> jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: RFR: JDK8U Backport of JDK-8042131 and JDK-8210633
>
> Hi Deepak,
>
> In particular, the test TestDateTimeFormatterBuilderWithLocale.java should
> have only one copyright year i.e. 2019, since this is a new file in jdk8u-dev
> repos. Also I think, you can omit the second copyright info(from line no. 24)
> for the same reason.
>
>
> Note: I am not a reviewer for JDK 8 Updates Project.
>
> Regards,
> Ramanand.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Deepak Kejriwal
> > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 10:11 AM
> > To: Naoto Sato <naoto.sato at oracle.com>; core-libs-dev <core-libs-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: RE: RFR: JDK8U Backport of JDK-8042131 and JDK-8210633
> >
> > Hi Naoto,
> >
> > Thanks for review. I will update the copyright information and push the
> > changes.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Deepak
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Naoto Sato
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 10:59 PM
> > To: Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com>; core-libs-dev <core-
> > libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK8U Backport of JDK-8042131 and JDK-8210633
> >
> > Hi Deepak,
> >
> > Please modify the copyright year accordingly. Otherwise it looks good to
> me.
> >
> > Naoto
> >
> > On 3/22/19 8:51 AM, Deepak Kejriwal wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please review the back port of fix for JDK-8042131 and JDK-8210633 to 8u-
> > dev:-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > JBS report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042131
> > >
> > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210633
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8042131_8210633/webrev.00/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Master bug change set:
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/f2d94a0619a2
> > >
> > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/a0426bc28519
> > >
> > > Summary:
> > > The backport of fix for both bugs JDK-8042131 (from 11u) and JDK-
> 8210633
> > (from 12u) are not clean backport. Changes for file
> > "DateTimeFormatterBuilder.java" are manually merged. Since, test file
> > "TestDateTimeFormatterBuilderWithLocale.java" is new in 8u release only
> > test cases modified as part for JDK-8042131 and JDK-8210633 are added.
> > >
> > > All tests are run against the changes and found to be passing.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Deepak
> > >
> > >
> > >
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list