RFR (M): JDK-6394757: AbstractSet.removeAll semantics are surprisingly dependent on relative sizes

[Stuart Marks]

On 5/3/19 6:20 AM, Tagir Valeev wrote:
> I'm not a Reviewer, but strongly support this change. Simpler is better. Thanks!

[capitalization adjusted]

Hi Tagir,

Thanks for looking at this! I appreciate the review.

As an aside for other readers, there's no requirement that one be a (capital-R) 
Reviewer in order to review code or changes. If you see a mistake or some issue, 
please point it out, even if you're not a Reviewer. This can be a useful 
contribution. The requirement for integration is that there be a review from 
least one Reviewer. There can be any number of reviews from non-Reviewers.

s'marks