RFR 8224789 : Parsing repetition count in regex does not detect numeric overflow
Roger Riggs
Roger.Riggs at oracle.com
Tue May 28 16:33:27 UTC 2019
Hi Ivan,
test/jdk/java/util/regex/RegExTest.java:
4954: The test should print the failing exception information and
4951: a message if the Pattern.compile does not fail to distinguish that
failure from any others.
I don't think there is a need for so many cases of values > 2^31; there
is no different code path for all those values.
They are fairly cheap, but redundant.
Otherwise, looks fine.
Thanks, Roger
On 05/25/2019 02:28 AM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> When Pattern.compile() parses the repetition count in the expressions
> like '.{100}', '.{1,2}' or '.{3,}' it fails to detect numeric overflow
> if the result is still non-negative.
>
> Could you please help review the patch?
>
> BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224789
> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8224789/00/webrev/
>
> Also, reading a char at line 3274 is done with skip(), so the
> exception thrown at 3315 displays the position of the error more
> accurately.
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list