RFR: 8224986: (str) optimize StringBuilder.append(CharSequence, int, int) for String arguments

Jim Laskey james.laskey at oracle.com
Wed May 29 15:43:18 UTC 2019


+1

> On May 29, 2019, at 12:36 PM, Claes Redestad <claes.redestad at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> it's been pointed out[1] that append(string.substring(start, end)) can
> outperform append(string, start, end) in some circumstances. In part due
> the former being intrinsified, but also I think due it tickling some
> string concat optimizations that allow for eliding the StringBuilder
> itself completely when there's only one non-constant argument.
> 
> While not ruling out intrinsification of append(String, int, int), I was
> able to achieve a reasonable speed-up by peeling off String arguments
> to append(CharSequence, int, int) and dropping into a routine that uses
> System.arraycopy when appropriate.
> 
> This seems like a reasonable improvement in the interim, and an
> opportunity to incorporate the relevant microbenchmarks.
> 
> Bug:    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224986
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8224986/open.00/
> 
> I extended and incorporated the microbenchmark provided in [1] to also include variants with UTF16 Strings and mixes of arguments, ensuring
> speedups on all appendBounds* variants[2].
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> /Claes
> 
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2019-January/057834.html
> [2]
> Baseline:
> 
> Benchmark            (length)  Mode  Cnt     Score     Error   Units
> appendBounds             1000  avgt   10   576.939 ±  21.125   ns/op
> ·gc.alloc.rate.norm     1000  avgt   10  2144.000 ±   0.001    B/op
> appendBoundsMix          1000  avgt   10   855.308 ±  27.071   ns/op
> ·gc.alloc.rate.norm     1000  avgt   10  3160.000 ±   0.001    B/op
> appendBoundsUtf16        1000  avgt   10  1424.518 ±  33.319   ns/op
> ·gc.alloc.rate.norm     1000  avgt   10  5192.000 ±   0.001    B/op
> 
> Patch:
> 
> Benchmark            (length)  Mode  Cnt     Score     Error   Units
> appendBounds             1000  avgt   10   466.640 ±  15.069   ns/op
> ·gc.alloc.rate.norm     1000  avgt   10  2120.000 ±   0.001    B/op
> appendBoundsMix          1000  avgt   10   758.886 ±  22.983   ns/op
> ·gc.alloc.rate.norm     1000  avgt   10  3160.000 ±   0.001    B/op
> appendBoundsUtf16        1000  avgt   10  1320.360 ±  49.097   ns/op
> ·gc.alloc.rate.norm     1000  avgt   10  5192.000 ±   0.001    B/op



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list