RFR: JDK-8227715: GPLv2 files missing Classpath Exception

Adam Farley8 adam.farley at uk.ibm.com
Tue Oct 8 15:06:16 UTC 2019


Hi Alan,

Removing jobjc will require changes to a bunch of files. If there's 
support for it, I can do the work, but we should split it into a seperate 
bug.

So the questions are:

1) Can I get a second opinion on the complete removal of everything jobjc 
(in a seperate bug)?

2) What are peoples' thoughts on having the Classpath Exception added to 
the remaining three files?

-- 
jdk/make/src/classes/build/tools/generatelsrequivmaps/EquivMapsGenerator.java 

-- jdk/make/src/native/add_gnu_debuglink/add_gnu_debuglink.c 
-- jdk/make/src/native/fix_empty_sec_hdr_flags/fix_empty_sec_hdr_flags.c 

Best Regards

Adam Farley 
IBM Runtimes


Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote on 07/10/2019 13:57:53:

> From: Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>
> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>, Joe Darcy 
> <joe.darcy at oracle.com>, Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com, 
> lana.steuck at oracle.com, magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
> Cc: Java Core Libs <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>, Florian Weimer 
> <fw at deneb.enyo.de>, jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Date: 07/10/2019 13:58
> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227715: GPLv2 files missing Classpath Exception
> 
> On 07/10/2019 13:51, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> :
> -- jdk/src/macosx/native/jobjc/JObjC.xcodeproj/default.pbxuser 
> It might be simpler to just get rid of the JObjC bits. If you dig 
> through the JDK 8 history then you should see that JObjC.jar was 
> dropped from the boot class path (it should never have been there in
> the first place). The remaining left overs were removed in JDK 9.
> 
> -Alan
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list