[8u] RFR: 8142543: Unformatted code example in API

Evgeny Mandrikov mandrikov at gmail.com
Wed Sep 18 22:51:37 UTC 2019


On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:32 PM Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 9/18/19 10:23 PM, Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
> > So AFAIU from the above wiki page - first 8142543 should be closed as
> dup of 8073347,
>
> For this case, I would comment in JDK-8142543 that JDK-8073347 fixes the
> same thing, without closing
> as dup yet. Then finish the backport, then maybe close as dup. There are
> weird interactions between
> "open" and "closed" 8u versioning here...
>

Ok

> then 8073347
> > should be labeled jdk8u-fix-request with a comment like
> >
> > Fix Request (jdk8u)
> > Patch is trivial (documentation-only). Only slight path modification is
> required due to
> > repo-consolidation past 8u, after which patch applies cleanly.
>
> Yes. You might also mention it fixes the regression introduced by
> JDK-8019857.
>

Done


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list