RFR: 8257882: Implement linkToNative intrinsic on AArch64

Nick Gasson ngasson at openjdk.java.net
Thu Dec 10 09:15:48 UTC 2020


On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:20:38 GMT, Nick Gasson <ngasson at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This is more-or-less a straight port of the x86 code to AArch64.
> GraphKit::make_native_call() calls SharedRuntime::make_native_invoker()
> to generate a blob that jumps to the native function entry point. This
> simply switches the thread state from Java to native and handles the
> safepoint poll on return from native code.
> 
> AArch64 suffers the same problem as x86 in JDK-8251047 where R29 (frame
> pointer) may hold a live oop over the MachCallNative node. Normally this
> would be saved by RegisterSaver::save_live_registers() but the native
> invoker blob is not a "proper" stub routine so doesn't have an oop map.
> I copied the x86 solution to this where the frame pointer register is
> saved to the stack and a pointer to that is stored in the frame anchor.
> This is then read back and added to the register map when walking the
> stack. I saw in the PR comments [1] that this might be a temporary fix,
> but I'm not sure if there's any plan to change that now?
> 
> Another potential fix might be to change the C2 register definition of
> R29 and R29_H to be save-on-call as below. This works for the
> TestStackWalk.java test case but I don't know whether it has other
> unintended side-effects.
> 
>   reg_def R29     ( SOC,  NS, Op_RegI, 29, r29->as_VMReg()        ); // fp
>   reg_def R29_H   ( SOC,  NS, Op_RegI, 29, r29->as_VMReg()->next());
> 
> JMH results from jdk/incubator/foreign/CallOverhead.java to show it's
> working:
> 
> -Djdk.internal.foreign.ProgrammableInvoker.USE_INTRINSICS=false:
> 
> Benchmark                                    Mode  Cnt     Score     Error  Units
> CallOverhead.jni_blank                       avgt   30    51.450 ?   0.363  ns/op
> CallOverhead.jni_identity                    avgt   30    54.145 ?   0.627  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_args10                   avgt   30  1914.431 ?  73.771  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_args5                    avgt   30  1394.274 ?  49.369  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_blank                    avgt   30   872.878 ?  20.716  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_blank_trivial            avgt   30   873.852 ?  21.350  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_identity                 avgt   30  1058.729 ?  20.229  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_identity_memory_address  avgt   30  1041.648 ?  22.930  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_identity_struct          avgt   30  3212.483 ? 151.627  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_identity_trivial         avgt   30  1056.398 ?  18.779  ns/op
> 
> -Djdk.internal.foreign.ProgrammableInvoker.USE_INTRINSICS=true:
> 
> Benchmark                                    Mode  Cnt     Score     Error  Units
> CallOverhead.jni_blank                       avgt   30    51.519 ?   0.345  ns/op
> CallOverhead.jni_identity                    avgt   30    54.689 ?   0.687  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_args10                   avgt   30    42.856 ?   0.760  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_args5                    avgt   30    42.192 ?   0.712  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_blank                    avgt   30    41.934 ?   0.349  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_blank_trivial            avgt   30     2.806 ?   0.545  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_identity                 avgt   30    44.043 ?   0.398  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_identity_memory_address  avgt   30    45.021 ?   0.409  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_identity_struct          avgt   30  3206.829 ? 175.750  ns/op
> CallOverhead.panama_identity_trivial         avgt   30     7.849 ?   1.651  ns/op
> 
> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign/pull/279#issuecomment-679172326

@JornVernee and @mcimadamore could you take a look too?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1711


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list