RFR: 8257882: Implement linkToNative intrinsic on AArch64 [v2]
Jorn Vernee
jvernee at openjdk.java.net
Thu Dec 10 13:58:36 UTC 2020
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:15:47 GMT, Nick Gasson <ngasson at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is more-or-less a straight port of the x86 code to AArch64.
>> GraphKit::make_native_call() calls SharedRuntime::make_native_invoker()
>> to generate a blob that jumps to the native function entry point. This
>> simply switches the thread state from Java to native and handles the
>> safepoint poll on return from native code.
>>
>> AArch64 suffers the same problem as x86 in JDK-8251047 where R29 (frame
>> pointer) may hold a live oop over the MachCallNative node. Normally this
>> would be saved by RegisterSaver::save_live_registers() but the native
>> invoker blob is not a "proper" stub routine so doesn't have an oop map.
>> I copied the x86 solution to this where the frame pointer register is
>> saved to the stack and a pointer to that is stored in the frame anchor.
>> This is then read back and added to the register map when walking the
>> stack. I saw in the PR comments [1] that this might be a temporary fix,
>> but I'm not sure if there's any plan to change that now?
>>
>> Another potential fix might be to change the C2 register definition of
>> R29 and R29_H to be save-on-call as below. This works for the
>> TestStackWalk.java test case but I don't know whether it has other
>> unintended side-effects.
>>
>> reg_def R29 ( SOC, NS, Op_RegI, 29, r29->as_VMReg() ); // fp
>> reg_def R29_H ( SOC, NS, Op_RegI, 29, r29->as_VMReg()->next());
>>
>> JMH results from jdk/incubator/foreign/CallOverhead.java to show it's
>> working:
>>
>> -Djdk.internal.foreign.ProgrammableInvoker.USE_INTRINSICS=false:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> CallOverhead.jni_blank avgt 30 51.450 ? 0.363 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.jni_identity avgt 30 54.145 ? 0.627 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_args10 avgt 30 1914.431 ? 73.771 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_args5 avgt 30 1394.274 ? 49.369 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_blank avgt 30 872.878 ? 20.716 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_blank_trivial avgt 30 873.852 ? 21.350 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_identity avgt 30 1058.729 ? 20.229 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_identity_memory_address avgt 30 1041.648 ? 22.930 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_identity_struct avgt 30 3212.483 ? 151.627 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_identity_trivial avgt 30 1056.398 ? 18.779 ns/op
>>
>> -Djdk.internal.foreign.ProgrammableInvoker.USE_INTRINSICS=true:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> CallOverhead.jni_blank avgt 30 51.519 ? 0.345 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.jni_identity avgt 30 54.689 ? 0.687 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_args10 avgt 30 42.856 ? 0.760 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_args5 avgt 30 42.192 ? 0.712 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_blank avgt 30 41.934 ? 0.349 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_blank_trivial avgt 30 2.806 ? 0.545 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_identity avgt 30 44.043 ? 0.398 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_identity_memory_address avgt 30 45.021 ? 0.409 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_identity_struct avgt 30 3206.829 ? 175.750 ns/op
>> CallOverhead.panama_identity_trivial avgt 30 7.849 ? 1.651 ns/op
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign/pull/279#issuecomment-679172326
>
> Nick Gasson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Review comments
Thanks for the amazing work!
FWIW, on x86 RBP was being passed as debug info, so the solution Vlad I proposed would be to override MachCallNativeNode::in_RegMask to not include it IIRC. I haven't had time to look into it yet though.
The situation on AArch64 seems to be different though? The RFP is not passed as debug info but as part of the normal calling convention maybe?
src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/sharedRuntime_aarch64.cpp line 3104:
> 3102: const GrowableArray<VMReg>& output_registers) {
> 3103: BufferBlob* _invoke_native_blob =
> 3104: BufferBlob::create("nep_invoker_blob", MethodHandles::adapter_code_size);
That reminds me; this should _not_ use MethodHandles::adapter_code_size, but a separate constant, since the former is tailored specifically to method handle stubs (and is too large for this case). I still need to update the one for x86 as well (looks like I forgot to do that one before when I changed them for invoker/upcall handler). I think 1024 bytes should be more than enough, but would need to test it.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by jvernee (Committer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1711
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list