Build error with GCC 10 in NetworkInterface.c and k_standard.c
Koichi Sakata
sakatakui at oss.nttdata.com
Fri Jul 17 11:26:08 UTC 2020
Hi Daniel,
> The changes to NetworkInterface.c look good to me.
Thank you.
> You'll need to find a reviewer that understands what that
> method is supposed to do in that case, that's not me ;-)
I understand. This ML is suitable for finding a reviewer, isn't it?
Or, there is another way. We can avoid the error by the accepting
maybe-uninitialized warning in libfdlibm instead of fixing k_standard.c.
diff --git a/make/modules/java.base/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk
b/make/modules/java.base/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk
--- a/make/modules/java.base/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk
+++ b/make/modules/java.base/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS_JDKLIB) $(LIBFDLIBM_CFLAGS), \
CFLAGS_windows_debug := -DLOGGING, \
CFLAGS_aix := -qfloat=nomaf, \
- DISABLED_WARNINGS_gcc := sign-compare misleading-indentation
array-bounds, \
+ DISABLED_WARNINGS_gcc := sign-compare misleading-indentation
array-bounds maybe-uninitialized, \
DISABLED_WARNINGS_clang := sign-compare, \
DISABLED_WARNINGS_microsoft := 4146 4244 4018, \
ARFLAGS := $(ARFLAGS), \
Thanks,
Koichi
On 2020/07/15 3:36, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Koichi,
>
> On 13/07/2020 08:03, Koichi Sakata wrote:
> > I understand that. I respect your idea.
> > I fixed the patch as follows.
> The changes to NetworkInterface.c look good to me.
>
> >
> > By the way, k_standard.c still remains. Is there a way to proceed
> with it?
>
> You'll need to find a reviewer that understands what that
> method is supposed to do in that case, that's not me ;-)
>
> best regards,
>
> -- daniel
>
>> Thanks, > Koichi
>>
>> ===== PATCH =====
>> diff --git a/src/java.base/unix/native/libnet/NetworkInterface.c
>> b/src/java.base/unix/native/libnet/NetworkInterface.c
>> --- a/src/java.base/unix/native/libnet/NetworkInterface.c
>> +++ b/src/java.base/unix/native/libnet/NetworkInterface.c
>> @@ -1296,7 +1296,8 @@
>> static int getIndex(int sock, const char *name) {
>> struct ifreq if2;
>> memset((char *)&if2, 0, sizeof(if2));
>> - strncpy(if2.ifr_name, name, sizeof(if2.ifr_name) - 1);
>> + strncpy(if2.ifr_name, name, sizeof(if2.ifr_name));
>> + if2.ifr_name[sizeof(if2.ifr_name) - 1] = 0;
>>
>> if (ioctl(sock, SIOCGIFINDEX, (char *)&if2) < 0) {
>> return -1;
>> @@ -1359,7 +1360,8 @@
>> static int getFlags(int sock, const char *ifname, int *flags) {
>> struct ifreq if2;
>> memset((char *)&if2, 0, sizeof(if2));
>> - strncpy(if2.ifr_name, ifname, sizeof(if2.ifr_name) - 1);
>> + strncpy(if2.ifr_name, ifname, sizeof(if2.ifr_name));
>> + if2.ifr_name[sizeof(if2.ifr_name) - 1] = 0;
>>
>> if (ioctl(sock, SIOCGIFFLAGS, (char *)&if2) < 0) {
>> return -1;
>> diff --git a/src/java.base/share/native/libfdlibm/k_standard.c
>> b/src/java.base/share/native/libfdlibm/k_standard.c
>> --- a/src/java.base/share/native/libfdlibm/k_standard.c
>> +++ b/src/java.base/share/native/libfdlibm/k_standard.c
>> @@ -739,6 +739,10 @@
>> errno = EDOM;
>> }
>> break;
>> + default:
>> + exc.retval = zero;
>> + errno = EINVAL;
>> + break;
>> }
>> return exc.retval;
>> }
>>
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list