RFR: JDK-8247592: refactor test/jdk/tools/launcher/Test7029048.java
Mandy Chung
mandy.chung at oracle.com
Tue Jul 21 23:26:16 UTC 2020
Hi Aleksei,
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avoitylov/webrev.8247592.01/
This refactoring seems okay. I would suggest to change the run method
to return an int or boolean to indicate the test passed or failed. The
caller of the run method (i.e. runTest will add to the failedTests list
if the return value indicates test failure. No need to pass the
failedTest list to the run method as an argument.
Typo in line 90: s/bug got/but got/
Otherwise, looks okay.
Mandy
On 7/21/20 10:37 AM, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gently reminiding about this simple test refactoring. The patch still
> applies cleanly.
>
> -Aleksei
>
> On 24/06/2020 11:44, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to refactor test/jdk/tools/launcher/Test7029048.java, make the
>> logic easier to follow and remove some magic numbers from the test:
>>
>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8247592
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avoitylov/webrev.8247592.01/
>>
>> Testing: the test passes on Linux x86, Linux x86_64, Linux ARM, Linux
>> AArch64, Linux PPC, Windows x86, Windows x86_64, Mac, AIX. Special
>> thanks to SAP team for helping test on AIX.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Aleksei
>>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list