Build error with GCC 10 in NetworkInterface.c and k_standard.c

[Andrew Haley]

On 17/07/2020 12:26, Koichi Sakata wrote:
> 
>  > You'll need to find a reviewer that understands what that
>  > method is supposed to do in that case, that's not me ;-)
> 
> I understand. This ML is suitable for finding a reviewer, isn't it?
> Or, there is another way. We can avoid the error by the accepting 
> maybe-uninitialized warning in libfdlibm instead of fixing k_standard.c.

I think it'd be better to fix it. Although the logic is such that all of
the cases are covered by the switch statement in k_standard.c, the default
case should return NaN in retval: use zero/zero.

I'll approve that.

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671