JDK 16 RFR of JDK-8250240: Address use of default constructors in the java.util.concurrent

[Joe Darcy]

Hi Martin,

Okay; I'll push with "public", but would be fine if the 166-alpha crew 
want to revisit for "protected".

Thanks for the review,

-Joe

On 7/23/2020 7:49 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> I'm happy with this change whether or not the slightly more evocative
> "protected" is used.
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>