RFR: 8230117 removing dead code from jar tool

Lance Andersen Lance.Andersen at oracle.com
Wed Mar 11 12:19:15 UTC 2020


FYI 

I will be pushing today after one last Mach  5 run completes

--

Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com



> On Mar 11, 2020, at 8:16 AM, Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Adam,
>  
> thanks for opening up the bug and reposting. Looks good to me ��
>  
> Cheers
> Christoph
>  
> From: Adam Sotona <adam.sotona at oracle.com> 
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. März 2020 11:32
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Cc: Lance Andersen <lance.andersen at oracle.com>; Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>; core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR: 8230117 removing dead code from jar tool
>  
> Hi Christoph,
> thank you for clarification, here it is:
>  
> JBS:  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230117
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asotona/8230117/webrev.00/
>  
> Mach5 Tier1, Tier2 and Tier3 tests passed.
>  
> Thanks,
> Adam
> 
> 
> On 1 Mar 2020, at 21:16, Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote:
>  
> Hi Adam, Lance,
> 
> as you've already figured out, attachments sent out to the mailing list will be removed. So it's important to generate webrevs and link to it or, for smaller patches, inline it. ��
> 
> Also, the RFR subject is missing a bug ID. From the URL to the webrev I take the bug ID is JDK-8230117. Going to JBS it seems that the bug is confidential. Could you please either open up the bug before pushing or alternatively, create a new, public bug to push this against?
> 
> Thanks
> Christoph
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf
> Of Lance Andersen
> Sent: Freitag, 28. Februar 2020 18:04
> To: Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>
> Cc: core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR: removing dead code from jar tool
> 
> sigh it is being removed it appears by the mail server
> 
> I placed a copy here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/JDK-8230117.patch
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/JDK-8230117.patch>
> 
> 
> On Feb 28, 2020, at 12:00 PM, Lance Andersen
> <lance.andersen at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Here it is again
> 
> 
> On Feb 28, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> I think you forgot to attach the patch.
> 
> --Sean
> 
> On 2/28/20 2:28 AM, Adam Sotona wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I would like to ask for review of the attached patch removing dead code
> from jar tool
> 
> Class files sun.tools.jar.Manifest and sun.tools.jar.SignatureFile appear
> to be dead code and should be removed.
> 
> Build with the patch passes all Tier1, Tier2 and Tier3 tests.
> Thank you,
> Adam
> 
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> 
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance
> Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
> 
> Oracle Java Engineering
> 1 Network Drive
> Burlington, MA 01803
> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>
> 
> 
> 
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen|
> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
> Oracle Java Engineering
> 1 Network Drive
> Burlington, MA 01803
> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>
> 
> 
>  
>  


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list