RFR: 8223347: Integration of Vector API (Incubator)
Jie Fu
jiefu at openjdk.java.net
Thu Oct 1 01:27:19 UTC 2020
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:01:23 GMT, Paul Sandoz <psandoz at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi @PaulSandoz ,
>>
>> I think it would be better to integrate it [1] in this MR.
>>
>> I have tested this MR on our AVX512 machines and it still crashes.
>> Also, for the sake of maintenance, it seems NOT a good idea to push a problematic commit into the jdk main-line repo.
>>
>> As for the review process, I don't think it's a problem since the fix [1] is clear and small enough.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/panama-vector/commit/1af35c357066743935bd3f48ce3610a41761f89a
>
> @DamonFool I appreciate your efforts on this but i want to hold back on that issue and follow up very quickly after
> integration of this PR. This change has been through an extremely long and arduous review process, and i want to stick
> to what was reviewed and not ask reviewers to go through further cycles on what overall is a very large change.
> Unfortunately this change is in a holding pattern waiting for the CSR to be approved thereby increasing the window
> where we might find further issues (that if we had already integrated may have been dealt with separately perhaps in a
> less timely fashion with respect to that integration). Unless an issue is extremely severe I think we should queue them
> up in `panama-vector/vectorIntrinsics` (there is at least one more for ARM SVE that is queued up). Since the issue you
> describe effects one instruction, for one type, on AVX512, its impact is limited and will be mitigated by a quick
> follow up.
Okay.
I can understand it.
Vector API is very valuable to us.
Hope the follow-ups can be integrated as soon as possible.
And thank you all for your great work.
Best regards,
Jie
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/367
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list