RFR: 8238669: Long.divideUnsigned is extremely slow for certain values (Needs to be Intrinsic)
Raffaello Giulietti
raffaello.giulietti at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 14:37:11 UTC 2020
Hi Brian,
thanks for taking a look.
I didn't write JMH benchmarks.
Greetings
Raffaello
On 2020-09-02 16:25, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Hi Raffaello,
>
> I can take a look. Did you write any (JMH?) microbenchmarks?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
>> On Sep 2, 2020, at 5:52 AM, Raffaello Giulietti
>> <raffaello.giulietti at gmail.com <mailto:raffaello.giulietti at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> here's a patch for [1], which is currently unassigned. Anybody willing
>> to sponsor it?
>>
>> The fix is based on "Hacker's Delight" (2nd ed), section 9.3 and makes
>> use of longs only, no BigInteger, no garbage to collect. It is faster
>> and "greener" than the current code.
>>
>> Contrary to the dramatic plea in the subject, with this fix I think
>> there's no pressing need for an intrinsic.
>>
>> The fix should be back-portable to 11 and 8, where the methods first
>> appeared, but I only tried on a current changeset [2].
>>
>> Passes tier1.
>>
>> If anybody needs the fix as attachment, just let me know.
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list