RFR: 8244706: GZIP "OS" header flag hard-coded to 0 instead of 255 (RFC 1952 non-compliance)

Joe Darcy joe.darcy at oracle.com
Mon Sep 14 22:49:34 UTC 2020


Should issue have a CSR review for the behavior change?

-Joe

On 9/12/2020 7:25 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:38:34 GMT, Lance Andersen <lancea at openjdk.org> wrote:
>
>>> Can I please get a review and a sponsor for this patch which fixes the issue reported in
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244706?
>>> The commit here sets the `OS` header flag to `255` (which represents `unknown`) as noted in [1]. A new test has been
>>> included in this commit to verify the change. Furthermore, this doesn't impact the `java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream`
>>> since it ignores [2] this header value while reading the headers from the stream.  [1]
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1952#page-7 [2]
>>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/GZIPInputStream.java#L173
>> Hi Jaikiran,
>>
>> The change seems fine an inline with the RFC.  I can sponsor this once we have another review.
>>
>> I have run the JCK tests for Zip/Gzip/Jar and Mach5 JDK tier1, tier2 and tier3
> Thank you Lance for the review and running the tests. I'll wait for another review before initiating the integrate
> command.
>
> -------------
>
> PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/130


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list