RFR: 8173585: Intrinsify StringLatin1.indexOf(char) [v2]

Volker Simonis simonis at openjdk.java.net
Mon Sep 21 10:00:30 UTC 2020


On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:56:09 GMT, Jason Tatton <github.com+70893615+jasontatton-aws at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This is an implementation of the indexOf(char) intrinsic for StringLatin1 (1 byte encoded Strings). It is provided for
>> x86 and ARM64. The implementation is greatly inspired by the indexOf(char) intrinsic for StringUTF16. To incorporate it
>> I had to make a small change to StringLatin1.java (refactor of functionality to intrisified private method) as well as
>> code for C2.  Submitted to: hotspot-compiler-dev and core-libs-dev as this patch contains a change to hotspot and
>> java/lang/StringLatin1.java  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173585
>> 
>> Details of testing:
>> ============
>> I have created a jtreg test “compiler/intrinsics/string/TestStringLatin1IndexOfChar” to cover this new intrinsic. Note
>> that, particularly for the x86 implementation of the intrinsic, the code path taken is dependent upon the length of the
>> input String. Hence the test has been designed to cover all these cases. In summary they are:
>> - A “short” string of < 16 characters.
>> - A SIMD String of 16 – 31 characters.
>> - A AVX2 SIMD String of 32 characters+.
>> 
>> Hardware used for testing:
>> -----------------------------
>> 
>> - Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 (JVM did not recognize this as having AVX2 support) • Intel i7 processor (with AVX2 support).
>> - AWS Graviton 2 (ARM 64 processor).
>> 
>> I also ran; ‘run-test-tier1’ and ‘run-test-tier2’ for: x86_64 and aarch64.
>> 
>> Possible future enhancements:
>> ====================
>> For the x86 implementation there may be two further improvements we can make in order to improve performance of both
>> the StringUTF16 and StringLatin1 indexOf(char) intrinsics:
>> 1. Make use of AVX-512 instructions.
>> 2. For “short” Strings (see below), I think it may be possible to modify the existing algorithm to still use SSE SIMD
>> instructions instead of a loop.
>> Benchmark results:
>> ============
>> **Without** the new StringLatin1 indexOf(char) intrinsic:
>> 
>> | Benchmark  | Mode | Cnt | Score | Error | Units |
>> | ------------- | ------------- |------------- |------------- |------------- |------------- |
>> | IndexOfBenchmark.latin1_mixed_char | avgt | 5 | **26,389.129** | ± 182.581 | ns/op |
>> | IndexOfBenchmark.utf16_mixed_char | avgt | 5 | 17,885.383 | ± 435.933  | ns/op |
>> 
>> 
>> **With** the new StringLatin1 indexOf(char) intrinsic:
>> 
>> | Benchmark  | Mode | Cnt | Score | Error | Units |
>> | ------------- | ------------- |------------- |------------- |------------- |------------- |
>> | IndexOfBenchmark.latin1_mixed_char | avgt | 5 | **17,875.185** | ± 407.716  | ns/op |
>> | IndexOfBenchmark.utf16_mixed_char | avgt | 5 | 18,292.802 | ± 167.306  | ns/op |
>> 
>> 
>> The objective of the patch is to bring the performance of StringLatin1 indexOf(char) in line with StringUTF16
>> indexOf(char) for x86 and ARM64. We can see above that this has been achieved. Similar results were obtained when
>> running on ARM.
>
> Jason Tatton has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now
> contains four commits:
>  - Merge master
>  - 8173585: further whitespace changes required by jcheck
>  - JDK-8173585 - whitespace changes required by jcheck
>  - JDK-8173585

src/hotspot/share/classfile/vmSymbols.cpp line 295:

> 293:   if (symbol == NULL)  return NO_SID;
> 294:   return find_sid(symbol);
> 295: }

I think it is common sense to have a newline at the end of a file.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/71


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list