RFR: 8247666: Support Lambda proxy classes in static CDS archive
Ioi Lam
iklam at openjdk.java.net
Wed Sep 30 04:09:10 UTC 2020
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:52:24 GMT, Calvin Cheung <ccheung at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Following up on archiving lambda proxy classes in dynamic CDS archive
> ([JDK-8198698](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198698)), this RFE adds the functionality of archiving of
> lambda proxy classes in static CDS archive.
> When the -XX:DumpLoadedClassList is enabled, the constant pool index related to LambdaMetafactory that are resolved
> during application execution will be included in the classlist. The entry for a lambda proxy class in a class list will
> be of the following format:
> `@lambda-proxy: <classname> <cp index>`
>
> e.g.
> `@lambda-proxy: test/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandlesGeneralTest 233`
> `@lambda-proxy: test/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandlesGeneralTest 355`
>
> When dumping a CDS archive using the -Xshare:dump and -XX:ExtraSharedClassListFile options, when the above
> `@lambda-proxy` entry is encountered while parsing the classlist, we will resolve the corresponding constant pool
> indices (233 and 355 in the above example). As a result, lambda proxy classes will be generated for the constant pool
> entries, and will be cached using a similar mechanism to JDK-8198698. During dumping, there is check on the cp index
> and on the created BootstrapInfo using the cp index. VM will exit with an error message if the check has failed.
> During runtime when looking up a lambda proxy class, the lookup will be perform on the static CDS archive and if not
> found, then lookup from the dynamic archive if one is specified. (Only name change (IsDynamicDumpingEnabled ->
> IsCDSDumpingEnabled) is involved in the core-libs code.)
> Testing: tiers 1,2,3,4.
>
> Performance results (javac on HelloWorld on linux-x64):
> Results of " perf stat -r 40 bin/javac -J-Xshare:on -J-XX:SharedArchiveFile=javac2.jsa Bench_HelloWorld.java "
> 1: 2228016795 2067752708 (-160264087) ----- 377.760 349.110 (-28.650) -----
> 2: 2223051476 2063016483 (-160034993) ----- 374.580 350.620 (-23.960) ----
> 3: 2225908334 2067673847 (-158234487) ----- 375.220 350.990 (-24.230) ----
> 4: 2225835999 2064596883 (-161239116) ----- 374.670 349.840 (-24.830) ----
> 5: 2226005510 2061694332 (-164311178) ----- 373.512 351.120 (-22.392) ----
> 6: 2225574949 2062657482 (-162917467) ----- 374.710 348.380 (-26.330) -----
> 7: 2224702424 2064634122 (-160068302) ----- 373.670 349.510 (-24.160) ----
> 8: 2226662277 2066301134 (-160361143) ----- 375.350 349.790 (-25.560) ----
> 9: 2226761470 2063162795 (-163598675) ----- 374.260 351.290 (-22.970) ----
> 10: 2230149089 2066203307 (-163945782) ----- 374.760 350.620 (-24.140) ----
> ============================================================
> 2226266109 2064768307 (-161497801) ----- 374.848 350.126 (-24.722) ----
> instr delta = -161497801 -7.2542%
> time delta = -24.722 ms -6.5951%
I have reviewed a small part of the changes. Here are my initial comments
src/hotspot/share/classfile/systemDictionaryShared.cpp line 336:
> 334:
> 335: static unsigned int dumptime_hash(Symbol* sym) {
> 336: if (sym == NULL) {
How about adding a comment "_invoked_name may be NULL"?
src/hotspot/share/classfile/systemDictionaryShared.cpp line 2300:
> 2298:
> 2299: class ArchivedLambdaMirrorPatcher {
> 2300: static void update(Klass* k) {
I think ArchivedLambdaMirrorPatcher can be subclass of ArchivedMirrorPatcher. That way you can share the same code for
ArchivedMirrorPatcher::update (you can make this a protected method).
src/hotspot/share/classfile/systemDictionaryShared.cpp line 2242:
> 2240: st->print_cr("Dynamic Shared Lambda Dictionary");
> 2241: SharedLambdaDictionaryPrinter ldp(st);
> 2242: _dynamic_lambda_proxy_class_dictionary.iterate(&ldp);
I think this function can be refactored, something like:
SystemDictionaryShared::print_on(outputStream* st) {
if (UseSharedSpaces) {
print_on("", &_builtin_dictionary, &_unregistered_dictionary, &_lambda_proxy_class_dictionary);
if (DynamicArchive::is_mapped()) {
print_on("Dynamic ", &dynamic__builtin_dictionary, &_dynamic_unregistered_dictionary,
&_dynamic_lambda_proxy_class_dictionary);
}
}
}
src/hotspot/share/classfile/systemDictionaryShared.cpp line 1984:
> 1982: int compare_runtime_lambda_proxy_class_info(const RunTimeLambdaProxyClassNode& r1,
> 1983: const RunTimeLambdaProxyClassNode& r2) {
> 1984: ResourceMark rm;
Is this function being used?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/364
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list