RFR: 8265075: Improve and simplify Class.resolveName()
Peter Levart
peter.levart at gmail.com
Tue Apr 13 15:27:21 UTC 2021
Hi, Sergey!
Have you measured the code change in the java.lang.Class itself or just
equivalent code in the JMH test as you show us?
The JMH test may show better results as it is compiled to bytecode that
uses special invokedynamic-based string concatenation with optimal MH
based underlying strategy. The code in java.lang.Class can't be compiled
to use this kind of concatenation because of bootstraping issues and is
therefore compiled to bytecode that uses StringBuilder directly (much
like the existing code of the patched method). So I'm wondering whether
the improvement in speed is actually there...
Regards, Peter
On 4/13/21 2:55 PM, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
> In mentioned method this code snippet
>
> int len = baseName.length() + 1 + name.length();
> StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(len);
> name = sb.append(baseName.replace('.', '/'))
> .append('/')
> .append(name)
> .toString();
>
>
> can be simplified with performance improvement as
>
> name = baseName.replace('.', '/') + '/' + name;
>
> Also null check of `baseName` can be removed as Class.getPackageName() never returns null.
>
> This benchmark
>
> @State(Scope.Thread)
> @BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)
> @OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)
> @Fork(jvmArgsAppend = {"-Xms2g", "-Xmx2g"})
> public class ResolveNameBenchmark {
>
> private final Class<? extends ResolveNameBenchmark> klazz = getClass();
>
> @Benchmark
> public Object original() {
> return original("com/tsypanov/ovn/ResolveNameBenchmark.class");
> }
>
> @Benchmark
> public Object patched() {
> return patched("com/tsypanov/ovn/ResolveNameBenchmark.class");
> }
>
> private String original(String name) {
> if (!name.startsWith("/")) {
> String baseName = getPackageName();
> if (baseName != null && !baseName.isEmpty()) {
> int len = baseName.length() + 1 + name.length();
> StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(len);
> name = sb.append(baseName.replace('.', '/'))
> .append('/')
> .append(name)
> .toString();
> }
> } else {
> name = name.substring(1);
> }
> return name;
> }
>
> private String patched(String name) {
> if (!name.startsWith("/")) {
> String baseName = getPackageName();
> if (!baseName.isEmpty()) {
> return baseName.replace('.', '/') + '/' + name;
> }
> return name;
> }
> return name.substring(1);
> }
>
> private String getPackageName() {
> return klazz.getPackageName();
> }
> }
>
> demonstrates good improvement, especially as of memory consumption:
>
> Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>
> original avgt 50 57.974 ± 0.365 ns/op
> original:·gc.alloc.rate avgt 50 3419.447 ± 21.154 MB/sec
> original:·gc.alloc.rate.norm avgt 50 312.006 ± 0.001 B/op
> original:·gc.churn.G1_Eden_Space avgt 50 3399.396 ± 149.836 MB/sec
> original:·gc.churn.G1_Eden_Space.norm avgt 50 310.198 ± 13.628 B/op
> original:·gc.churn.G1_Survivor_Space avgt 50 0.004 ± 0.001 MB/sec
> original:·gc.churn.G1_Survivor_Space.norm avgt 50 ≈ 10⁻³ B/op
> original:·gc.count avgt 50 208.000 counts
> original:·gc.time avgt 50 224.000 ms
>
> patched avgt 50 44.367 ± 0.162 ns/op
> patched:·gc.alloc.rate avgt 50 2749.265 ± 10.014 MB/sec
> patched:·gc.alloc.rate.norm avgt 50 192.004 ± 0.001 B/op
> patched:·gc.churn.G1_Eden_Space avgt 50 2729.221 ± 193.552 MB/sec
> patched:·gc.churn.G1_Eden_Space.norm avgt 50 190.615 ± 13.539 B/op
> patched:·gc.churn.G1_Survivor_Space avgt 50 0.003 ± 0.001 MB/sec
> patched:·gc.churn.G1_Survivor_Space.norm avgt 50 ≈ 10⁻⁴ B/op
> patched:·gc.count avgt 50 167.000 counts
> patched:·gc.time avgt 50 181.000 ms
>
> -------------
>
> Commit messages:
> - 8265075: Improve and simplify Class.resolveName()
>
> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3464/files
> Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3464&range=00
> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265075
> Stats: 11 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 7 del; 4 mod
> Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3464.diff
> Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3464/head:pull/3464
>
> PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3464
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list